Reading the Inquisition | Transcribe | The Huntington Library, San Marino, CA

home

Transcription

<p><br></p><table class="table table-bordered"><tbody><tr><td><span id="docs-internal-guid-c3705581-7fff-3124-5813-ac91943e91de"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; background-color: transparent; font-style: italic; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">que estubo con su muger segunda casa de Chepe Reyes junto a Malacatepque dos o 3 dias se fue luego a Zaqualpa donde estubo algun tiempo y de aqui salio con animo de hir aver si hera viba su primera muger y de camino paso por Malacatepeque donde hubo con la segunda aquella noche y se bolbio a dormir en casa de Chepe Reyes, sin bolberla aver mas ni hazerla ynstanzia para llevarsela. Recombenido con que en la respuesta del capitulo 7</span><span style="font-size: 6.6pt; font-family: Arial; background-color: transparent; font-style: italic; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: super; white-space: pre-wrap;">o</span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; background-color: transparent; font-style: italic; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> de la Acusazion, o, aqui miente porque halla Dixo que solo una vez havia estado con dicha Maya y esa a lo ultimo quando se venia a aberiguar si su primera muger hera muerta porque de lo que acaba de dezir se conoze que ya son dos vezes las que la vio </span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; background-color: transparent; font-style: italic; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; text-decoration-line: line-through; text-decoration-skip-ink: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">la 1.a al venir y ydo de Zitaquaro</span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; background-color: transparent; font-style: italic; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> en esta ocasion ultima, y no una. Dijo que no entenderia bien el Capitulo 7</span><span style="font-size: 6.6pt; font-family: Arial; background-color: transparent; font-style: italic; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: super; white-space: pre-wrap;">o</span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; background-color: transparent; font-style: italic; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> de esta Acusazion y asi diria lo que se le Dize pero que la verdad es lo que lleba aqui declarado. Y que es falso que el aya dicho a su</span></span><br></td><td><span id="docs-internal-guid-d67c2860-7fff-0572-488e-db0a4bbc85e0"><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">su muger en 13 de Octubre del 1733 denunziandose en dicha partida ser el mestizo y de San Juan Zitaquaro, y ella de Temascaltepeque, y española. </span></p><br><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Y por quanto en el echo de este segundo Matrimonio no hay cosa notable no se ponen los testigos por extenso, y solo se dize ser quatro los que testifican de casamiento, y Velazion quando refiere la partida, y que el motibo de casarse este Reo que porque antes estaba amanzevada con dicha Maya y con la mision del Padre Martinez de la Compania se movio a casarse. Los testigos fueron Gregorio Lopez, Mestizo, su muger Sebastiana Gomez Padrinos del Matrimonio, el sachristan de la Parroquia Don Pedro de Ocampo Ramirez, Don Joseph de la Borda natural de Canfran en el Reyno de Aragon</span></p><div><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></span></div></span></td></tr></tbody></table><p><br></p>

Save transcription Enter transcription here

comments powered by Disqus

Translation

que estubo con su muger segunda casa de Chepe Reyes junto a Malacatepque dos o 3 dias se fue luego a Zaqualpa donde estubo algun tiempo y de aqui salio con animo de hir aver si hera viba su primera muger y de camino paso por Malacatepeque donde hubo con la segunda aquella noche y se bolbio a dormir en casa de Chepe Reyes, sin bolberla aver mas ni hazerla ynstanzia para llevarsela. Recombenido con que en la respuesta del capitulo 7o de la Acusazion, o, aqui miente porque halla Dixo que solo una vez havia estado con dicha Maya y esa a lo ultimo quando se venia a aberiguar si su primera muger hera muerta porque de lo que acaba de dezir se conoze que ya son dos vezes las que la vio la 1.a al venir y ydo de Zitaquaro en esta ocasion ultima, y no una. Dijo que no entenderia bien el Capitulo 7o de esta Acusazion y asi diria lo que se le Dize pero que la verdad es lo que lleba aqui declarado. Y que es falso que el aya dicho a su

su muger en 13 de Octubre del 1733 denunziandose en dicha partida ser el mestizo y de San Juan Zitaquaro, y ella de Temascaltepeque, y española.

Y por quanto en el echo de este segundo Matrimonio no hay cosa notable no se ponen los testigos por extenso, y solo se dize ser quatro los que testifican de casamiento, y Velazion quando refiere la partida, y que el motibo de casarse este Reo que porque antes estaba amanzevada con dicha Maya y con la mision del Padre Martinez de la Compania se movio a casarse. Los testigos fueron Gregorio Lopez, Mestizo, su muger Sebastiana Gomez Padrinos del Matrimonio, el sachristan de la Parroquia Don Pedro de Ocampo Ramirez, Don Joseph de la Borda natural de Canfran en el Reyno de Aragon

<p><br></p><table class="table table-bordered"><tbody><tr><td><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;" id="docs-internal-guid-1835c506-7fff-b011-fb55-691b1188cf34">that he was with his second wife in Chepe Reyes’s house near Malacatepec two or 3 days, he then left for Zacualpan, where he was for some time and from here he left with the intention of going to see if his first wife was alive, and on the road he passed through Malacatepec where he was with his second wife that night and then he returned to sleep in Chepe Reyes’s house, without returning to see her again nor insisting to take her away. He was confronted with his reply in chapter 7 of the Accusation, or he is lying here because he said that he was with the said Maya only one time and this was when he came to see if his first wife was dead, but, regarding what he just said, it is already known that he went to see her twice, </span><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:line-through;-webkit-text-decoration-skip:none;text-decoration-skip-ink:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">the first when he came and left from Zitácuaro</span><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;"> on this last occasion, and not once. He said that he did not understand well chapter 7 of the Accusation and so he would say that which he said but the truth is what he has been declaring here. And that it is false that he had said to his</span></td><td><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;" id="docs-internal-guid-3f53dd03-7fff-e919-51d1-8f761b9043a8"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">his wife, in attendance on October 13, 1733. It states that he is a mestizo and from San Juan Zitácuaro and she is from Temascaltepec and a Spaniard.</span></p><br><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">And since in the execution of this second marriage there was nothing out of the ordinary, the witnesses were not questioned at length. It says only that there were four who witnessed the marriage contract and ceremony, as referred to on the certificate, and that the motive for this defendant’s marriage was because before he was living in concubinage with the aforementioned Maya and that the Jesuit Father Martínez’s mission moved him to marry her. The witnesses were Gregorio López, mestizo and his wife Sebastiana Gómez, who were the </span><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:italic;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">padrinos del matrimonio</span><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">; the parish sacristan Don Pedro de Ocampo Ramírez; Don Joseph de la Borda, native of Canfranc in the kingdom of Aragón,</span></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><br></p>